Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Forest Star U13 F.C.


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Black Kite (talk) 15:11, 7 July 2012 (UTC)

Forest Star U13 F.C.

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Non-notable amateur youth football team. Haven't played in the national cup competition and so fail WP:FOOTYN, otherwise fails WP:GNG. Basa lisk inspect damage⁄berate 19:00, 29 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 19:55, 29 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. &#9733;&#9734; DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 19:57, 29 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete Non-notable U13s team. Agree with nominator.  Del ♉ sion 23  (talk)  20:11, 29 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete - no evidence of notability. GiantSnowman 20:18, 29 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete nn. U13, really? KTC (talk) 22:18, 29 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete - No indication of significant coverage, meaning this article fails WP:GNG. Sir Sputnik (talk) 02:16, 30 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete - clearly non-notable -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:56, 1 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete - youth teams are rarely notable, and I see no evidence that this is an exception.  Bettia talk 10:51, 3 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete - NN, for shame. Brianhe (talk) 04:35, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete per CSD G11. Quote: They have 12 players including me. Errr...if that isn't COI, I don't know what is... Cyan  Gardevoir  (used EDIT!) 10:52, 7 July 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.