Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Forest of Burzee


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to The Life and Adventures of Santa Claus. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 14:38, 6 July 2022 (UTC)

Forest of Burzee

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

There isn't meaningful coverage in reliable third-party sources to build an encyclopedic article, as per WP:GNG. WP:PROD was reverted without references that more than trivially mention the subject and its existence. Jontesta (talk) 00:25, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Jontesta (talk) 00:25, 15 June 2022 (UTC)


 * Keep or merge with The Life and Adventures of Santa Claus. If it is the latter, I ask that the closer transfers the information that describes the Forest of Burzee to the suggested page while starting a section to contain this information. --Rtkat3 (talk) 19:50, 16 June 2022 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 02:43, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Weak keep or merge. User:Jontesta, while we often see eye to eye (I think), here we have two sentences of analysis sourced to an academic book (Riley). While we could ask whether WP:SIGCOV is met, your nom's ignoring of it seems unfair. Likewise, you don't say anything about whether you've done a BEFORE search. My BEFORE did fail to find anything else that's not a plot summary, so my preference is for a merge, however, this is not an entity that has, obviously, no significance at all, as you implied. If someone finds better sources, ping me, as this has potential (per the source cited). Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 07:39, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  This AfD discussion includes a proposal for merger to The Life and Adventures of Santa Claus,,, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , and a notice of the proposed merger was posted to on June 25. As such, this AfD discussion may need to be extended or relisted to incorporate input from. Thanks, Kevin McE (talk) 15:33, 25 June 2022 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 10:18, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Merge to The Life and Adventures of Santa Claus - While there are a couple sentences of sourced material here, it is far to brief to be considered WP:SIGCOV, and the majority of the article is just plot information sourced to the pieces of fiction themselves. I tried some various searches, and could not find any kind of significant coverage in reliable sources beyond what is already in the article. Merging those few pieces of reliably sourced information to The Life and Adventures of Santa Claus would be a good idea, though.Rorshacma (talk) 15:01, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Merge per all. Nothing to cover except plot information, and we need independent coverage to meet the WP:GNG. Shooterwalker (talk) 21:43, 30 June 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.