Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Forever Alexa

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete. &mdash; Xezbeth 16:16, Jun 24, 2005 (UTC)

Forever Alexa
Forever Alexa has no purpose on Wikipedia, is self-promoting, and Alexa Vega (of whom I'd never heard) is simply too minor, IMHO. Hope I did this all in decorum. I'm still new. Recnilgiarc 01:56, Jun 17, 2005 (UTC)


 * No vote. I fixed the links above (you had Alexa Vega instead of Forever Alexa). --SPUI (talk) 02:02, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete non-notable, non-encyc and largely an ad. Google turns up only their website and an Alexa search (to my amusement) returns only that it is not in the top 100,000. PS. Which version is the second picture down?-Splash 02:20, Jun 17, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete and Redirect to Alexa Vega, whoever she is. - Jersyko talk  02:27, Jun 17, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete She's the Spy Kids girl. Anyway, this fansite has No Alexa Rank to speak of. Andrew Lenahan - St ar bli nd  02:40, Jun 17, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete on the grounds that it is an ad, has poor Google results, and has no Alexa rank. The wikipedia isn't a web directory, so sites should only go on here if there's a dern good reason (ie. a high rating). The article is horribly doomed from: "what makes this site so special? Well, the site features Alexa Vega as one of its members!" anyways :| -- Consumed Crustacean | Talk | 03:32, Jun 17, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete I don't understand what it's about. Muijzo 03:41, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete as a non-notable website but include as a link in Alexa Vega who is a notable actress, having starred in the Spy Kids movies and the recent release Sleepover. 23skidoo 03:49, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fansites don't get articles unless they're world-famous.   [  +t,  +c  ] 04:08, Jun 17, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per Szyslak, but a link in Alexa Vega might be warranted if it's particularly informative. - Mgm|(talk) 08:19, Jun 17, 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be placed on a related article talk page, if one exists; in an undeletion request, if it does not; or below this section.