Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Forever beef


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 19:17, 16 November 2018 (UTC)

Forever beef

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

A WP:DICTDEF of a non-notable neologism (not even in the paper, just in one headline writer's imagination). power~enwiki ( π, ν ) 05:40, 9 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 05:46, 9 November 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete while the article title is a neologism, the article content/ subject matter (single academic study on existing Wikipedia issues) is probably best mentioned as appropriate in Wikipedia, Wiki, or any of subsidiary articles such as Academic studies about Wikipedia. As an uncommon neologism, I don't think the title is warranted as a redirect to any article that covers the subject, and such scant content is not worth preserving. Not every scientific paper with a flurry of press releases and churnalism warrants a stand-alone encyclopedia article, for crying out loud. --Animalparty! (talk) 03:52, 10 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete as does not pass WP:GNG regards Atlantic306 (talk) 18:34, 16 November 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.