Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Forever in the Friend Zone


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Suburban_Legends. Davewild (talk) 07:22, 18 June 2015 (UTC)

Forever in the Friend Zone

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article is only a track listing. Only reference is a link to purchase the album. — cocomonkilla | talk | contrib 00:05, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions.  Everymorning   talk  00:12, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:54, 28 May 2015 (UTC)


 * Redirect to Suburban_Legends. Right now there just isn't anything out there that would establish notability for this album. This might change once the album releases next week, but then again it may not. The best option would be for this to redirect to the main article for the band until the time if/when coverage in RS becomes available. Right now it's just WP:TOOSOON. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  03:06, 28 May 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete My vote would change if it is successful or if someone placed some actual info in the article beyond the infobox.TheGracefulSlick (talk) 12:09, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Redirect - Multiple searches found nothing to suggest it has received considerable coverage. SwisterTwister   talk  00:17, 29 May 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep The album has a release date in 3 days, I see no reason to remove this article. It's content is similar with the bands other wiki album pages. Currently, this album is download only, I would expect more info (band members, etc) to be added once the psychical cd is available. A quick search will show the album has received attention  User:Bobs Ska Radio 08:31 30, May 2015 (utc)


 * Try finding some attention in reliable sources instead, if you expect anybody to actually change their mind. Bearcat (talk) 04:05, 11 June 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 17:11, 4 June 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:00, 11 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Redirect to the band's page. All I was able to find, now that it's been released, are a couple of bad reviews, promotional materials, and discography lists. No real notable coverage... -Pax85 (talk) 04:07, 11 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Redirect to the band. No prejudice against recreation in the future if WP:RS coverage shows up, but fan forums and social media don't get an album into Wikipedia as a standalone topic and albums don't get a notability freebie just because they exist. Bearcat (talk) 17:17, 11 June 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.