Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Forgetters


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) Armbrust, B.Ed. Let's talk about my edits? 15:32, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

Forgetters

 * – ( View AfD View log )

The page has been tagged since 2009 for a lack of sources. Doing a search turns up no additional reliable third party sources. The band was short lived, and only released a single, self-published album, thus it does not meet the requirements of WP:BAND. Rorshacma (talk) 08:45, 1 February 2012 (UTC) JanusKie (talk) 17:31, 1 February 2012 (UTC) Okay, I went and added some more reliable third party sources to the page. JanusKie (talk) 17:45, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
 * The band meets the criteria of WP:BAND for a number of reasons, most strongly "Is an ensemble which contains two or more independently notable musicians, or is a musician who has been a member of two or more independently notable ensembles."
 * Comment-I had actually considered whether or not it met WP:Band due to the "contains two or more independently notable musicians" clause, but decided that of the two members that actually had individual wiki articles, only one really qualified, as the other seems very unnotable himself. Great work on the sources, though.  Rorshacma (talk) 18:19, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep - Per the adequate sources, also the notable artist. benzband  ( talk ) 20:19, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep I'm not convinced that "contains two notable members" is by itself a reason to keep, but the sources push this one over the edge. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 20:23, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 00:32, 2 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep - from the article's sources, there is enough significant coverage in reliable sources in my view; subject meets WP:GNG and WP:BAND.  Gongshow  Talk 04:17, 3 February 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.