Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Forgotten Kingdoms (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was  d elete. - Mailer Diablo 03:28, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

Forgotten Kingdoms

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

No claim of notability per WP:N, WP:WEB or WP:ORG. No independent references whatsoever (WP:V, the mudconnector link is merely a directory entry}. Kept on previous AfD on the grounds that it has "a player base of over 600", "appears notable", and the ol' "well wikipedia has other MUD articles..." Marasmusine 16:42, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been added to the list of video game deletions. Marasmusine 16:47, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Here's a link to the article: Forgotten Kingdoms (perhaps someone can tell me why I get the redlink above, even when I follow the 2nd nomination instructions on WP:AFD). Marasmusine 16:50, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete: Fails WP:WEB, WP:V.  No independent references.  I'm sure they're all very nice people, but since when does my unfounded and unsupported supposition matter?  (Oh, much like "appears notable.")    RGTraynor  20:29, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - Lack of independently verifiable info. Generic name makes Googling for sources difficult, "forgotten kingdoms" + RPG doesn't give me anything useful.  Wickethewok 03:02, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - For the usual mess of MMO article reasons. Unverifibale, no assertion of notability, no reliable secondary sources. DarkSaber2k 09:11, 22 May 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.