Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Forgotten Souls Brass Band


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Not a lot of discussion here, but the only person arguing to keep failed to provide specific examples of RS which support notability or any other policy-based reasoning. -- RoySmith (talk) 11:48, 26 March 2016 (UTC)

Forgotten Souls Brass Band

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No evidence of meeting WP:BAND. — swpb T 14:18, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Louisiana-related deletion discussions. — swpb T 14:21, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. — swpb T 14:21, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete They have several mentions in books on Google Books and also in about 5 to 8 articles on ProQuest, but none of the coverage goes beyond a mention that they are playing somewhere or one short paragraph on them, except for one interview with a band member about their many years appearing at the New Orleans Jazz & Heritage Fest. According to one of the ProQuest sources, this is an "all star ensemble" that plays only one or two gigs a year and the members seem to all either be in other bands or have other jobs the rest of the time. May merit a mention in the "Performers" section of the New Orleans Jazz & Heritage Festival article due to the number of years they've reportedly been appearing at it, but the sources don't seem sufficient to support a whole article on the band. TheBlinkster (talk) 19:37, 8 March 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep as there are enough RS to support a small article, the band has notable members and a 15 year historyAtlantic306 (talk) 21:39, 12 March 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 01:14, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as searches simply found nothing better than a few links. Atlantic305's comment is not clarifying how this article can actually be improved. SwisterTwister   talk  05:37, 24 March 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.