Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ForkLift (File Manager)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 23:12, 29 April 2017 (UTC)

ForkLift (File Manager)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Unsourced self-referenced advert. Cabayi (talk) 20:33, 14 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.   CAPTAIN RAJU  (✉)   20:51, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, f  e  minist  14:52, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep, could be improved to meet the WP:GNG with the following references:, , and -KAP03(Talk &bull;&#32;Contributions &bull;&#32;Email) 15:12, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Also the reference could be useful as it has a review (which could be used in making a reception section). -KAP03(Talk &bull;&#32;Contributions &bull;&#32;Email) 15:18, 22 April 2017 (UTC)


 * Keep – Meets GNG per a source review. This stub article does not have a promotional tone at all at this time. North America1000 06:47, 29 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep A WP:BEFORE indicates quite a bit of sourcing in non-blog / fansites . &mdash;  O Fortuna   semper crescis, aut decrescis  16:10, 29 April 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.