Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fork Knifing With Crunchy Tape


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the discussion was DELETE and BJAODN. Mo0 [ talk ] 19:30, 12 July 2006 (UTC)

Fork Knifing With Crunchy Tape
Someone's creative writing project, we can only assume. Kickstart70 - T - C 19:30, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. per nom -Seidenstud 19:33, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA --Macarion 19:37, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete This pretty much speaks for itself. --IslaySolomon 19:38, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Potential G1, very potential BJAODN. Tevildo 19:50, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, but please don't let this disappear into the ether - it belongs in BJAODN on the strength of its title alone! ~ Matticus78 19:51, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Unimportant Comment More By This Author, Toasts --Macarion 20:17, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Stick a fork in it, it's done and send to BJAODN. NawlinWiki 20:20, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - hahaha PresN 20:53, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, potential speedy (nonsensical). --ColourBurst 23:30, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Please let it disappear into the ether. --DaveG12345 03:58, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
 * BJAODN and/or DAFT - but D, whichever. Grutness...wha?  00:48, 9 July 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.