Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Formacion del doble arcoiris

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was DELETE. Rich Farmbrough 02:52, 13 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Formacion del doble arcoiris
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.
 * Spanish-language title is useless here. I'm also not at all sure what it says is accurate. On the other hand, I'd expect us to have an article on "double rainbow", and we don't, just a passing mention in rainbow that doesn't even use that term. -- Jmabel | Talk 08:10, Mar 6, 2005 (UTC)
 * Note. I've redirected double rainbow to rainbow, since the latter article already contains a couple of good diagrams of how rainbows (and double rainbows) form and a picture of a double rainbow. --TenOfAllTrades | Talk 18:37, 6 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete (no merge, no redirect). Spanish language title doesn't belong in English Wikipedia, and the described mechanism of double rainbow formation is flat-out wrong. There is already better and more complete information in rainbow. --TenOfAllTrades | Talk 18:37, 6 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. concurr with Ten. DaveTheRed 21:24, 6 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, there already exists a far more accurate and complete version at Rainbow. Megan1967 04:29, 7 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, redirect not useful. -- Cleduc 05:50, 7 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Redirect to rainbow to discourage recreation - David Gerard 10:12, 11 Mar 2005 (UTC)