Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Formal studies of Bigfoot


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Bigfoot. (non-admin closure) MrScorch6200  (talk &#124; ctrb) 01:21, 16 February 2014 (UTC)

Formal studies of Bigfoot

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Hi all, I've moved a great deal of content regarding the scientific and formal studies to the main Bigfoot page. I feel that a discussion of what exactly belongs in that section can be had for that page, but I don't feel that any of the content that I didn't move over is really reliable, notable, or relevant enough to justify keeping this page. This article has had a number of problems for about a year now and I don't think that the main Bigfoot page is too full to put the good stuff there. I look forward to hearing others' thoughts. Tegrenath (talk) 22:06, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Paranormal-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:36, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:36, 9 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep or redirect per Wikipedia attribution policies. Content has been copied and the source article's edit history will need to be preserved. • Gene93k (talk) 23:42, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Isn't there a merge history option as well, so the histories could be merged and this article deleted. IRWolfie- (talk) 00:43, 10 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Redirect - seems to be an unnecessary split from Bigfoot. Redirect it back to that article until the volume of information necessitates a split. Stalwart 111  00:35, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.