Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Formalities in English law


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was procedural closed because there is nothing in Wikipedia guidelines about allowing an AfD from more than a decade ago to be reopened. If desired, bring up for a new AfD using the proper process (with understanding a lot about this article may have changed in 10 years). SouthernNights (talk) 13:17, 23 July 2022 (UTC)

Formalities in English law

 * – (View AfD

Relisting comment: Relisting for close... Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, jp×g 09:49, 23 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep One of a list of disruptive AfD nominations being made by a brand new user.   Corvus cornix  talk  01:06, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Law and United Kingdom. Shellwood (talk) 09:29, 23 July 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Speedy keep, as there is no argument to delete. I mean that literally: through some bizarre series of events, this AfD was created with its only content being a single !vote of "speedy keep", no nomination, no nothing. jp×g 09:51, 23 July 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.