Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Formation of Postcolonial Englishes: Theories


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. I'd be happy to userify this if someone wants to try to integrate the content elsewhere. Lankiveil (speak to me) 22:51, 2 May 2014 (UTC)

Formation of Postcolonial Englishes: Theories

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Promotional/book review. May also fail WP:NOTJOURNAL. Notability not established. Ahecht ( TALK PAGE ) 21:25, 4 April 2014 (UTC)

Remove. Although I will assume good faith, I suppose that this article was created to help with sales of said book. Nonetheless, it fails the general notability guideline, and as such, shouldn't be on Wikipedia. Ging287 (talk) 00:03, 5 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:50, 5 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Move to Postcolonial English dialects. Bearian (talk) 18:42, 7 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 02:45, 12 April 2014 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar ♔  05:50, 20 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete as per WP:NOTESSAY; as almost certainly a student essay. Stuartyeates (talk) 05:22, 21 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Comment It seems a shame to lose all this material. I wonder if some could be merged into somewhere like History of the English language? I may drop a note at the linguistics Wikiproject. Olaf Davis (talk) 23:58, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Comment I agree that it would be a shame to lose the material. I also agree that it is definitely a student project of some sort. Perhaps it should be integrated into other pages. Joeystanley (talk) 20:52, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.