Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Former Airlines and Routes of San Francisco International Airport


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. --Core desat 03:08, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

Former Airlines and Routes of San Francisco International Airport

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Unencyclopedic listcruft; Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. dcandeto 08:57, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Indiscriminate list. What argument could possibly be made for a list of former airlines and routes of one city's airport? What is the context? Why is it needed? -- Cy ru s      An dir on   13:51, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. --Matt 14:23, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, failure of WP:NOT. If any of this information is important to the history of the airport that info can be placed there, but no reason to keep this article.  Ar ky an  &#149; (talk) 15:34, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. TonyTheTiger (talk/cont/bio) 17:37, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete if there's anything relevant to an encyclopedia it should be included in either the airport's article or the airlines' articles. Carlossuarez46 23:11, 11 April 2007 (UTC)


 * Keep Change is interesting and encyclopedic. This may be too arcane for the main article on the airport, but if not, I'm happy with merge. Fg2 04:37, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as unverified and unsourced original research. The subject could be informative, but this form is not the best way (as only a list). Tinlinkin 10:15, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Strong keep but needs citations. If merged to San Francisco airport, you'll see an immediate delete because some editors don't like a big list. That airport is historic enough to have a museum inside the airport and there have been big changes over the years. A880M 18:23, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.