Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Forms forms forms


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete, if you are able to provide reliable sources, you may recreate the article. Yamamoto Ichiro 会話 16:43, 15 February 2008 (UTC)

Forms forms forms

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Unsigned band with no reliable secondary sources to back up the claimed notability JD554 (talk) 11:30, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
 * (taken from the talk page: I'm not sure where you are from, but Stool Pigeon would certainly be considered a very authoratitive source in the UK, as would God Is In The TV. The YouTube ref is present because it links to an influencial documentary on the New Cross music scene, and links the band to this.


 * As for them being unsigned, that is inconsequential- in London, unsigned bands sell out large venues. Part of the article, which mentions them selling out a venue and playing a second set outside is surely testiment to this.


 * I suggest an Admin that knows about the music industry should look into this matter of deletion.


 * Surely Wikipedia should be a comprehensive a resource as possible, on all subjects? --Soapboxrallyy (talk) 11:59, 8 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Perhaps it (Stool Pigeon) is, but it also has to be verifiable and as you've only provided the name of the publication. You need to provide the more than that so the source for you assertion can be looked up and checked. --JD554 (talk) 14:54, 8 February 2008 (UTC)


 * (taken from the talk page. Please use this page for the discussion):What do you think the reference at the bottom is?!!! --Soapboxrallyy (talk) 22:10, 8 February 2008 (UTC)


 * It is a link which takes you to Stoolpigeon's main page which doesn't mention anything to with Forms Forms Forms. If you have a link to a page that does that would be better as it would then be verifiable. --JD554 (talk) 08:51, 11 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete. Clearly does not come close to meeting WP:MUSIC.  Vegaswikian (talk) 02:49, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - no WP:RS, no evidence of notability. Bearian (talk) 02:23, 15 February 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.