Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Formulism


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Can&#39;t sleep, clown will eat me 12:16, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

Formulism

 * — (View AfD)

Seems non-notable, website is dead. No ghits. Seems like something we made up in school one day. Megapixie 09:33, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. The word itself turns up in scientific, critical, and some older political texts, but is not in many dictionaries nor in wide use today, so we can probably do without it. --Dhartung | Talk 09:43, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. MER-C 10:24, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
 * 1+1=Deleted! Danny Lilithborne 11:12, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. OR at best. Tevildo 12:46, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - fails WP:WEB / lacks reliable sources / fails WP:V Jayden54 13:18, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete this is simply obscure non-sense. It definitely fails WP:V TSO1D 21:38, 5 January 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.