Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fornenst


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. I'm not going to transwiki this myself, as I'm unsure what form should be used as the headword—my copy of the Concise Scots Dictionary treats the word under the lemmas forenent and fornentis, considering for(e)nents a spelling variant of the latter). If anyone needs the text of this article for use on Wiktionary, I'll userfy it upon request. Deor (talk) 11:48, 4 August 2014 (UTC)

Fornenst

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This is a dictionary entry, and Wikipedia is not a dictionary. Vanjagenije (talk) 18:36, 19 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:45, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:45, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Agreed it's not very encyclopaedic. Added as it was in the requests list at Requested_articles/Social_sciences/Linguistics (as *forninst*). Alex Steer (talk) 20:32, 20 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar ♔   22:28, 26 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. Jinkinson   talk to me  22:46, 26 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Transwiki to fornenst. That does not exist, and this is clearly a real word, so it makes sense. BethNaught (talk) 06:53, 27 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete as dictionary definition. No objection to transwikification. Carrite (talk) 17:40, 3 August 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.