Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Forté Internet Software


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Forté Agent. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:05, 11 October 2017 (UTC)

Forté Internet Software

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not notable and contains little if any encyclopedic content. Appears to fail Wikipedia's General notability guideline. The article seems to be original research as there is no references within the whole article WP:OR. Mostly seems to exist to promote the company WP:NOTADVERTISING. FockeWulf FW 190 (talk) 19:21, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. --Cameron11598 (Talk) 01:19, 5 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. --Cameron11598 (Talk) 01:19, 5 October 2017 (UTC)


 * Redirect Not searched for references yet, but main source of notability for this company is its news reader Forté Agent. That should be an ideal redirect target. Although page in question has its own problems (only one somewhat RS reference, also posted on AfD), I´m sure I will be able to improve the target article with the help of PC Mag, NetworkWorld and other magazines and add some reliable sourced informations about this company. Pavlor (talk) 10:28, 5 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Merge/transfer, then Redirect into a section at Forté Agent, or vice versa. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 10:48, 5 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Merge the content into Forté Agent, then redirect. -- Gpc62 (talk) 05:36, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Merge seems like the sensible option -- HighKing ++ 16:31, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Merge - anything useful into Forté Agent and redirect. -- Longhair\talk 04:08, 10 October 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.