Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fort Lee Police Department


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Fort Lee, New Jersey. Vanamonde (Talk) 20:20, 18 April 2021 (UTC)

Fort Lee Police Department

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Per the same reasoning at Articles for deletion/Tustin Police Department: "See WP:CORP. A local police department that does not have any real inherent notability." Lettlerhello • contribs 22:46, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. Lettlerhello • contribs 22:46, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions. Lettlerhello • contribs 22:46, 10 April 2021 (UTC)

*Merge / Redirect to Fort Lee, New Jersey As per all above. Citterz (talk) 18:01, 12 April 2021 (UTC) striking confirmed blocked sockpuppet, Atlantic306 (talk) 23:54, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Merge / Redirect to Fort Lee, New Jersey - There is encyclopedic content that should be merged to the parent article. Alansohn (talk) 14:51, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Merge to Fort Lee, New Jersey. These is not enough on this department to justify a seperate article.John Pack Lambert (talk) 12:37, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep - whereas not having a lead section is a weakness, deletion is not improvement. Had the energy spent on trying to delete this been invested in improvements, the article would shine.  Well sourced. XavierItzm (talk) 12:34, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
 * I'm sorry, but I'm not going to spend a few hours cleaning up this crap of an article when it's just a random police department for a town of 35,000 people. Lettlerhello • contribs 15:05, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Exactly. There you go.  If you were doing WP:BEFORE, item C.1, you would see that per policy this is not a suitable candidate for deletion.   XavierItzm (talk) 20:27, 17 April 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.