Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fort Monostor


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy keep. Nomnation withdrawn. Thank you for finding the foreign sources; I didn't search the Hungarian Google thoroughly for sources. / ƒETCH COMMS  /  19:52, 25 November 2010 (UTC)

Fort Monostor

 * – ( View AfD View log ) •

Unsourced stub for years, can't find significant coverage to establish notability. / ƒETCH COMMS  /  03:02, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep: I did some quick work on it and added some sources and the Hungarian name for it. It does seem to be a quite notable location. E.g.,, "Perhaps the best preserved modern-age military complex in Central Europe, it is an architectural and military masterpiece. The largest part of a system of fortifications at Komárom has been called the 'Gibraltar of the Danube'."   The Hungarian wikipedia covers this fort as part of a more comprehensive article on the forts in this area of which Monostori is the biggest and most notable. (hu:Komáromi erődrendszer).--Milowent • talkblp-r  05:38, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep because of Milowent's research and improvements to the article. Perhaps some of the information quoted above could be rewritten and included in the article, or included as an attributed quotation? Cullen328 (talk) 06:05, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
 * I'll try to see if that tourism-related source I cited is reliable enough to be cited in the article, or look for something else.--Milowent • talkblp-r 14:37, 24 November 2010 (UTC)


 * Keep The potential for expansion is there, and this is a notable historic location. Nice work Milowent!  Sea photo Talk  18:54, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hungary-related deletion discussions.  -- Jclemens-public (talk) 21:52, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions.  -- Jclemens-public (talk) 21:52, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:41, 25 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Museums and libraries-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:41, 25 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep - now that it is referenced it appears to pass the notability threshold. A fascinating image too I might (well done whoever added that). Anotherclown (talk) 13:30, 25 November 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.