Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fort Peyton


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Notability well established, not a snowball's chance of this being deleted. Nominator is reminded of the requirements of WP:BEFORE, and that nominating an article for deletion within seven minutes of creation is biting the newbies. The Bushranger One ping only 17:27, 19 June 2012 (UTC)

Fort Peyton

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Non-notable fort. Could not find any third party reliable sources to indicate any notability. Tinton5 (talk) 02:26, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Question - Why was this article nominated for deletion within 20 minutes of its creation? --Oakshade (talk) 05:57, 19 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep - How can an historical fort be non-notable? It took me five seconds to find a ton third party reliable sources about this fort..  Nonsensical nomination. --Oakshade (talk) 05:57, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Snow keep In addition to Oakshade's sources, there's a ton of coverage via Gbooks and at least one particularly good source from Highbeam ; clearly meets WP:GNG. Yunshui 雲&zwj;水 10:17, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.