Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fort Work


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 05:44, 28 September 2016 (UTC)

Fort Work

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:NCORP. Coverage fails WP:CORPDEPTH. The article at first glance appears to be well-sourced, but many of the sources are the company's own web pages, and some of the references, such as the one from D magazine, do not mention the subject. ubiquity (talk) 14:48, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:57, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:57, 20 September 2016 (UTC)


 * delete per nom - if cut to RSes, this article would not exist - David Gerard (talk) 19:13, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete per my earlier PROD: "Fails WP:NCORP. Coverage fails WP:CORPDEPTH" shoy (reactions) 17:35, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
 * We have added references to Fastcompany and the New York Times, Dallas Culture Map and Dallas news — Preceding unsigned comment added by Geoffreybyers (talk • contribs) 23:11, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete per the nomination for deletion. Gary &#34;Roach&#34; Sanderson (talk) 23:13, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:PROMO; strictly an advertorial. No indications of notability or significance. K.e.coffman (talk) 02:38, 27 September 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.