Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Forte Communication Style Profile


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 23:42, 13 February 2024 (UTC)

Forte Communication Style Profile

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Others on the talk page raised concerns about the credibility/validity of this article about 10 years ago.

Although I attempted to revamp the lead, it became extremely clear to me that this article's sources are only primary sources, and that this entire piece seems extremely self-promoation. In order for this to be possibly made into a credible/balanced wikipedia article a lot of work is needed, and that assumes that it even warrents a page. As far as I can tell, this is not a commonly used measure. (And I say that as someone who teaches classes about personality psychology and psychological testing.) Mason (talk) 20:01, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Behavioural science and Psychology. Mason (talk) 20:01, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete: Unverifiable content created by a SPA/COI, and has resisted sourcing for over 13 years. Owen&times; &#9742;  23:20, 11 February 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.