Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Forthcoming Britney Spears' studio album


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. JForget 23:40, 3 August 2009 (UTC)

Forthcoming Britney Spears' studio album

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. Referenced only by speculative fan sites and primary sources. Likely notable once released but not today. Delete per TenPoundHammer's Law RadioFan (talk) 13:47, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment I'm skipping the prod step and going straight to AFD in anticipation of snow.--RadioFan (talk) 13:51, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.  —RadioFan (talk) 13:56, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
 * I'm kind of new, I just stumbled across the page in recent changes, but I think it should be deleted (I wanted to speedy but apprantly it didn't fit the categories.) It doesn't have a name... doesn't that violate the cystal ball guidelines? Martin Raybourne (talk) 14:05, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Clear WP:CRYSTAL violation.&mdash;Kww(talk) 14:25, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete as a future album, or merge to her main page. JJL (talk) 14:48, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:HAMMER Dylanfromthenorth (talk) 15:52, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete: looks like another crystal ball to be hammered into oblivion. No title, release date or track list.  Cliff smith  talk  17:26, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete. per WP:CRYSTAL, WP:NALBUM. I'm not citing WP:HAMMER because it is an essay and not official policy. -- RUL3R *flaming 18:09, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Although I agree with deletion, none of these are valid reasons for speedy deletion. Rlendog (talk) 15:10, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete as per nom. RP459 (talk) 18:54, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - no title, tracklist or release date firmer than "2010" means that this sign adequately sums up my opinion. DitzyNizzy (aka Jess) | (talk to me) | (What I've done)  14:12, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. And I'll cite WP:HAMMER because it doesn't matter if it is an essay or not, it sums it all up nicely. Also WP:NALBUM, WP:CRYSTAL and WP:SLOBBERINGFANBOY (Hammer's upcoming essay). Niteshift36 (talk) 02:13, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment. I propose to delete the previous comment con WP:CRYSTAL...nah, just kidding. -- RUL3R *flaming 05:28, 2 August 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete as it violates WP:CRYSTAL. Anyways, there isn't even a track list so it wouldn't warrant an article either way. talking  birds  14:26, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Look mama! It's snowing! -- RUL3R *flaming 16:49, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Strong delete. As mentioned above, lack of sources. The source for the "confirmed" track is an unverified Twitter. Further, I don't see a need to create an article at this title at any point in the future. By the time the album is notable, it should at least have a name. —C.Fred (talk) 20:52, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Frankly, I don't believe the album, when released, will be called "Forthcoming Britney Spears' studio album". Delete per WP:CRYSTAL, WP:NALBUMS as blatant "fandalism". Cheers, TFOWRThis flag once was red 10:56, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - WP:CRYSTAL, no real sources yet. Rlendog (talk) 15:08, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Mixed - Plenty of albums have pages called 'forthcoming album', and have only news of producers. Then again "Spring 2010" is nearly a year from now and it'll be a good 4-5 months before we hear actual news of this. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.17.57.61 (talk) 17:43, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment examples please?--RadioFan (talk) 23:04, 3 August 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete - HAMMERTIME! -- EA Swyer Talk Contributions 23:00, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.