Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FortuneFun

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was DELETE. Golbez 06:36, Jun 18, 2005 (UTC)

FortuneFun
Seems to be an ad. <200 Googles seem to argue against notability. --Xcali 21:14, 12 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Still a young industry. Expect to hear a lot about casino skill sites, like FortuneFun, SkillPalace and 888 Skill in the next 2-3 months. --FeldBum 19:08, 12 June 2005 (EST)


 * Rename to "Skill sites". We don't want ads, but the material discussed in the article sounds like an interesting legal issue. --Arcadian 04:00, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete website advertising. JamesBurns 04:59, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages.  Please do not edit this page .