Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Forum for Stable Currencies


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Three relists later, we have a consensus. Courcelles (talk) 19:33, 27 February 2023 (UTC)

Forum for Stable Currencies

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

I don't believe this political advocacy group meets WP:ORG or WP:ORGCRIT. The independent sources cited all appear to be passing mentions. The article's creator and primary contributor,, is the group's founder. Jfire (talk) 02:23, 6 February 2023 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Already PROD'd so not eligible for Soft Deletion. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 03:28, 13 February 2023 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   08:08, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and United Kingdom. Jfire (talk) 02:23, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Relisting comment: Final relist. Already PROD'd, not eligible for Soft Deletion. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 08:27, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete. Two hits in Wikipedia Library: one cites the Forum for Stable Currencies in a footnote, while the other is one sentence in the New Statesman article, which reads: The Forum for Stable Currencies has been meeting monthly in the House of Lords for two years now, attracting leading figures from the world of small business and across the political spectrum -- and presided over by the pipe-smoking Lord Sudeley, chairman of the Monday Club. The other sources currently cited in the article seem equally thin (or thinner). There isn't enough in-depth coverage to satisfy WP:GNG, let alone WP:ORG. Cielquiparle (talk) 10:02, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete - per above. — Ixtal ( T / C ) &#8258; Non nobis solum. — Preceding undated comment added 11:05, 27 February 2023 (UTC)


 * Delete - not notable enough PalauanReich (talk) 13:22, 27 February 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.