Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Forum raid


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete ~ trialsanderrors 00:22, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

Forum raid


Complete original research with no mainstream references Nacon kantari  19:50, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep - I have heard of the concept but it appears originial research as stated in the nom. However, i look at an article and ask, if i wanted information on this topic would I come to wikipedia first.  If i answer yet, i feel that WP:IAR is a good idea in this situation.  Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 19:54, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete or possibly Merge (as is already suggested in the article). No references at all, and Wikipedia is not a catalogue of dumb stuff people do on forums. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  20:03, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per Starblind. Sandstein 21:32, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete original research, yes. Pointless, yes. --SandyDancer 22:14, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, original research. Radagast83 17:02, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete, original research and patent nonsense. Anomo 13:39, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.