Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fosenlinjen


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Liz Read! Talk! 07:10, 3 November 2022 (UTC)

Fosenlinjen

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Seems to be not notable and without any reliable sources Dlerus Us (talk) 08:44, 11 October 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 08:51, 18 October 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 08:57, 25 October 2022 (UTC) Relisting comment: Final relist Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 20:43, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Dlerus Us (talk) 08:44, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Norway-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 08:49, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 07:19, 14 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment: The present article is rather basic, and there is no corresponding no.wiki article from which it could be improved, however some coverage can be found, such as this article on their Glutra/Nidaros II ferry and a paywalled article about their manager. Both are local coverage but, noting the lack of detail in the article about their Fosen operating area, I am wondering whether an option might be a partial merge into a new Transport section there, as I am guessing the ferries may be important to the area? It would be good to get views from Norwegian-reading editors. AllyD (talk) 07:27, 14 October 2022 (UTC)
 * I also found this 2019 article about the decision in a commercial law case that the firm had taken to the Norwegian Supreme Court. However, being a party to a legal case does not itself demonstrate notability. AllyD (talk) 07:34, 14 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Sock nomination, but leaving to be considered on its merits. MER-C 09:17, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.