Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fossil Hill Middle School


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Keller Independent School District. WP:NOTBURO The Bushranger One ping only 01:01, 24 January 2013 (UTC)

Fossil Hill Middle School

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This article about a middle school should be redirected per WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES. It states that elementary or middle schools generally do not have articles because they are non-notable in reliable sources for significant coverage requirements. In this case, that appears to be true; in addition, there are a number of trivial facts based on original research. Another user already attempted to redirect this to the school district article based on my observations, but a major contributor reverted the change and requested page protection, so I do feel the need to discuss this. Best, TBrandley (what's up) 05:10, 19 January 2013 (UTC) Delete Non-notable article per WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES. Zia Khan 17:51, 19 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Redirect to the school district article Per everything TBrandley said. I would also like to point out that once it was explained to him, the other editor did merge it already to the SD article.  All that remains is to blank this article and redirect. Gtwfan52 (talk) 05:31, 19 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Redirect per above. Zia Khan 11:51, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 22:48, 19 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 22:48, 19 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Redirect to Keller Independent School District, obviously. There is no reason to waste editor time at AfD when there is a well established precedent to follow. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 03:50, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.