Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fossy


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 11:24, 6 October 2006 (UTC)

Fossy
Urban dictionary neolgism, fails WP:V and WP:RS. Irongargoyle 18:21, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom unless a reliable source turns up. Looks like an attack page to me. -- zzuuzz (talk) 18:34, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete: It does show up in Urban Dictionary, so it's probably not a complete hoax. But with only six entries in urban dictionary, it's just not notable. Heimstern Läufer 21:36, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
 * The existence of an entry in Urban Dictionary does not demonstrate that something is not a hoax. Urban Dictionary is a self-submission web site that actually encourages the submission of made-up stuff.  Entries in Urban Dictionary carry little to zero weight.  Uncle G 12:03, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Well, that's why I said "probably". :-) Heimstern Läufer 14:50, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
 * One entry is from "Fragmaroom", same name who created this article. Femto 13:17, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, juvenile slangcruft. Speedy if this is another repost of phossy. Neither User:Fragmaroom nor User:Bass-roach  look like reliable editors. Femto 13:17, 2 October 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.