Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Foston Musik (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. j⚛e deckertalk 03:05, 29 December 2014 (UTC)

Foston Musik
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The article fails WP:GNG. The record label has not been discussed in reliable sources. The only artist signed to the label is Patoranking. Per WP:INHERITORG, a record label cannot inherit notability from the artists they're associated with.  V e r s a c e 1 6 0 8   (Talk) 21:07, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. - Fim atic  (talk &#124; contribs) 21:51, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. - Fim atic  (talk &#124; contribs) 21:51, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:05, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete: fails WP:GNG....the article is obviously leaning on the label's notable artist.--Jamie Tubers (talk) 10:28, 22 December 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete: No evidence of notability. Subject of the article fails WP:GNG. Wikic¤l¤gyt@lk to M£ 18:18, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.