Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fotolia


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was no consensus to delete. --Angr (t·c) 22:01, 17 December 2005 (UTC)

Fotolia
Non-notable, spam attempt and orphan article Mecanismo 10:36, 9 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment: Reads like an ad at the moment. I'm too lazy to check WP:WEB or Alexa, but if it can be rewritten and passes the Alexa rank test and/or otherwise proves importance then it should stay. If it can't, then delete. Zunaid 13:41, 9 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete - apparent ad. Even if it weren't an promotional, there's nothing really there in the article. B.Wind 00:44, 10 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Edit and Notability I made edits to make the site description appear less like an ad. I have nothing to do with Fotolia, I just think it's an innovative concept and deserves inclusion.  Also added Alexa data (it's ranked 8,628) to address the "non-notable" issue. Kanamekun 04:13, 11 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Weak keep, it appears somewhat notable now. However, if mine is the only vote to keep, then the closing admin has my permission to discount it. Stifle 23:42, 11 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Re: Weak keep Added some more detail around Strategy, to bolster the entry and make it clear why I think the concept is interesting. --Kanamekun 18:43, 14 December 2005 (UTC)04:13, 11 December 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.