Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Foundation for the Education of Needy Children in Fiji (2nd nomination)

Foundation for the Education of Needy Children in Fiji
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

No real evidence of notability. The sources found in the previous AfD are all either dead and not archived or do not discuss the company in sufficient depth to satisfy WP:CORPDEPTH, instead consisting of routine announcements of companies dontaing to them. While that's a noble goal it's not notability-establishing * Pppery * it has begun... 18:31, 28 June 2024 (UTC) Relisting comment: Not eligible for Soft Deletion. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 17:48, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, Education,  and Fiji. Shellwood (talk) 18:55, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 20:28, 12 July 2024 (UTC) Relisting comment: Final relist Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 23:15, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete: All coverage is WP:MILL. Not really anything about the company itself aside from funding announcements and press releases, which don't count towards notability per WP:ORGTRIV. The article is also in pretty rough shape and while I don't like deleting stuff for this reason, there simply isn't enough coverage out there to write a better article beyond a short stub.  C F A   💬  00:00, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep. There is a lot of coverage out there, most of it appearing to be press-release-based churnalism. But I think enough of it goes beyond WP:ORGTRIV, for example, these piece in the Fiji Times that involve reporting, and this piece in FBC News . There is also some mildly critical coverage that for sure wouldn't be from a press release, see Fiji Times and FBC News  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dclemens1971 (talk • contribs) 01:11, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
 * The first set of articles consists almost entirely of quotes from the organization hence fails WP:ORGIND. The second set does not discuss the organization in sufficient depth to satisfy WP:CORPDEPTH. * Pppery * it has begun...  01:15, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
 * I guess we disagree about what constitutes sufficient depth. I think several paragraphs constituting the whole of a news story on a single organization counts; I would describe the two more critical stories in particular as delivering "a level of attention that extends well beyond brief mentions and routine announcements" per WP:CORPDEPTH. Dclemens1971 (talk) 02:06, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep. I think the sources support the article well and particulary the sources that include some negative press. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rockycape (talk • contribs) 05:00, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Keep per Dclemens1971. --Un assiolo (talk) 23:15, 20 July 2024 (UTC)