Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Foundation for the Rights of Future Generations


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. WP:NPASR applies. ✗ plicit  11:49, 10 September 2022 (UTC)

Foundation for the Rights of Future Generations

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Lack of independent notability. QueenofBithynia (talk) 17:17, 21 August 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 18:49, 28 August 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 23:31, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and Germany. Shellwood (talk) 18:03, 21 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep. I'm only halfway through updating the article and adding sources (just getting to the interesting part), but am confident that there are enough independent sources establishing notability of this think tank, known in Germany as Stiftung für die Rechte zukünftiger Generationen, per WP:GNG or WP:NONPROFIT. For in-depth coverage, I would point to this 2000 article in e-Politik.de (For more info about the publication, see German Wikipedia; the author does not appear to be a representative of SRzG and the article is written neutrally and includes details that the organization itself was not pushing in its own press materials.) There is also a review of a book published by the SRzG in the academic journal Zeitschrift für Politik, and an in-depth article in Tagesspiegel on the origins of a legislative prize awarded by the SRzG, which includes a couple of quotes from the foundation but also quotes from external sources and the journalists' own observations and fact-finding. In addition, there are numerous academic sources within the article now analyzing the importance of the SRzG/FRFG and providing political context, also in English, specifically included because they aren't just citing SRzG publications as a source (with the exception of 2 pieces so far by Tremmel). I haven't done a thorough search of German newspapers yet (which I have limited access to) but fully expect that there is more to find there. Cielquiparle (talk) 15:58, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.