Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fountain of ecstasy


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete -- JForget  23:12, 10 August 2008 (UTC)

Fountain of ecstasy

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Original research discussion of a novel, with no claim of meeting WP:Notability for the book. Gsearch not coming up with notability for the book; hasn't made the NY Times best seller list; amazon sales rank > 1,000,000. Contested prod. Author has no article, so nothing to redirect to. Fabrictramp |  talk to me  22:43, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  22:45, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete The article is unsourced opinion about a book that shows no sign of notability. Edward321 (talk) 23:13, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete per WP:OR --  Darth Mike   ( Talk  • Contribs ) 01:09, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. Non-notable book review. --Steven Fruitsmaak (Reply) 20:20, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete per WP:SNOW as evident from discussion above. Pure original opinion.  Cliff smith  talk  05:06, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per others. Doctorfluffy (robe and wizard hat) 02:18, 9 August 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.