Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Four (drink)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was KEEP (no consensus). TigerShark (talk) 00:53, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

Four (drink)

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Malted drink that has no reliable secondary sources to demonstrate notability. Gavin Collins (talk) 08:38, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.   -- Gavin Collins (talk) 08:38, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete: article fails notability per WP:N. Mh29255 (talk) 14:55, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete It is badly written, extremely short, and uses the official website as the only reference. I cannot find a single thing for this article on Google. Although the term is a bit ambiguous, if it were popular and famous enough to be on Wikipedia, there'd be some stuff for it. There isn't any. It doesn't meet notability. ― LADY GALAXY 16:11, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
 * I change my opinion to a weak keep. The article needs to be expanded, however. ― LADY GALAXY 22:22, 14 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep. I added some references. --Eastmain (talk) 20:30, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment these links cannot be categorised as reliable secondary sources as they are press releases about the product launch. --Gavin Collins (talk) 10:59, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment. Convenience Store News and Bottle Watch are reliable secondary sources. The articles used press releases as sources, but are themselves secondary sources. --Eastmain (talk) 21:40, 16 January 2008 (UTC)


 * If a press release was used, it's not a secondary source. Secret account 19:25, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete can't find anysources other than the company website and press releases, the two sources Eastmain linked are press releases. Secret account 20:23, 15 January 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.