Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Four Capital Accounting


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete

Four Capital Accounting

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

This article has no sources to affirm it's notability, and may be advertising Absurdist 05:22, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as WP:NEO, or as spam/part of a walled garden with Gund Institute for Ecological Economics (could bundle it here, as that appears to fail WP:CORP). DMacks 05:36, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 11:21, 16 July 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete - though frankly there is so little comprehensible context (but lots of "paradigm" babble) that I can't really tell if this is really an advert (delete per WP:SPAM), a pseudo company profile (WP:CORP), or a neologism (WP:NEO). Ugh. -- MarcoTolo 00:53, 22 July 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete This term only netted 4 results on the search engine, none of which are reliable sources. Also, according to the results, the action described by the subject haven't been used at all. This shows that it's a non-notable neologism, or probably original research.--Kylohk 12:32, 22 July 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.