Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Four Horsemen (Jericho episode)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. j⚛e deckertalk 06:23, 13 March 2014 (UTC)

Four Horsemen (Jericho episode)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable TV series episode, fails WP:GNG. The pisode is already summarised at List of Jericho episodes, so no need to merge.

The article is referenced only to one source: a review on IGN.com. However, IGN is in not independent. The company's own website describes it as an media and services provider, not as indpendent publication.

Even if editors somehow overlook the nature of IGN, one review does not amount to "significant coverage" per GNG. Brown HairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 15:59, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. I wouldn't agree that citing IGN would be detrimental for television articles such as this, as it has been used on some good articles. As the sole review, however, it cannot support the article. Whisternefet (c &#183; l) 01:16, 6 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:43, 6 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:43, 6 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Comment - Just as a note, IGN is an independent source and would count towards GNG consideration, as it has no direct ties to the producers of the show or of the broadcasting station, which is the test we use for independence. But that said, one source is not going to meet GNG requirements (that's not significant coverage). --M ASEM  (t) 15:57, 6 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete most of the Jericho TV series episode articles should be deleted, being redundant with the list and mostly just plot dumps. Winning the timeslot doesn't make an episode notable, otherwise we'd make an article for every single episode that won some media market. -- 70.50.151.11 (talk) 06:01, 12 March 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.