Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Four Points by Sheraton Niagara Falls


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Consensus that notability is not met Nosebagbear (talk) 13:42, 23 November 2020 (UTC)

Four Points by Sheraton Niagara Falls

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Unsourced article about a perfectly normal nice hotel. The article contains no claim of notability and does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NBUILD: "Buildings, including private residences and commercial developments, may be notable as a result of their historic, social, economic, or architectural importance, but they require significant coverage by reliable, third-party sources to establish notability." Does not have coverage that meets significant coverage by reliable, third-party sources to establish notability WP:RS, WP:SIGCOV and the article makes no claim that there is historic, social, economic, or architectural importance. WP:BEFORE revealed advertising, WP:ROUTINE, WP:MILL coverage, and directory style listings. A perfectly normal nice hotel.  // Timothy ::  talk  06:20, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions.   // Timothy ::  talk  06:20, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions.   // Timothy ::  talk  06:20, 16 November 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete Due to being a run of the mill hotel with nothing notable about it. As is reflected in the lack of notable content in the article and the bad sourcing. Both of which clearly point to this not passing the notability guidelines. BTW, I wish Wikipedia had a dark theme. --Adamant1 (talk) 08:21, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete. Hotels are pretty WP:MILL, and exist in every city on earth. (Some small towns might not have any hotels, but any city of moderate size will.) And furthermore, the vast majority of hotels are part of international hotel chains rather than being standalone independent entities. Accordingly, there's no point in indiscriminately maintaining an unsourced article about every hotel that exists — the bar for making a hotel notable enough for a Wikipedia article requires reliably sourced evidence of its significance, such as a noteworthy historical or cultural impact. Bearcat (talk) 14:28, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete - nothing to suggest that this warrants a stand-alone article; fails GNG/NBUILD Spiderone  16:41, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete, Article is clearly not notable in any form, failing both WP:GNG and WP:NBUILD, and also lacks any claim of significance within the article. Builder018 (talk) 10:54, 18 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:MILL - "One of many". Bearian (talk) 22:14, 18 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete: At least the other Sheraton on today's AfD log had a G20 conference and a guy died there once. This seems to have absolutely nothing distinctive about it. And there are absolutely no sources! jp×g 12:28, 23 November 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.