Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Four Queens


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was keep. - Mailer Diablo 13:58, 14 December 2005 (UTC)

Four Queens
No claim to notability being made. Arguably spam. Ben Aveling 11:04, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep I consider the major Las Vegas casinos to be notable, for much the same reasoning that theme parks are notable. Both "Four Queens" +Vegas and "Four Queens" +Casino bring Google hits in the 400,000+ range.  Though there's always room for debate, I suppose, certainly there's more to be written about even minor casinos than any given garage band, forum troll, MMORPG player, etc. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  13:44, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep per google hits. Kappa 16:02, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
 * -reservervation -reservations brings google hits down to about 122,000. Still a lot.  And yet, the article is empty, it's barely more than a link to the official site, and it doesn't explain why this casino is anyway notable.  Could we merge to somewhere and redirect without prejudice?  Ben Aveling 20:31, 8 December 2005 (UTC)


 * Keep, and expand. Stifle 23:48, 9 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. I have added some additional information, still need to find out a lot more.  Vegaswikian 06:36, 11 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep The Four Queens is a well established and well known Las Vegas landmark. Misterrick 14:36, 12 December 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.