Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Four Wise Monkeys


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  Sandstein  21:01, 1 September 2008 (UTC)

Four Wise Monkeys

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Contested speedy. Totally nn web content. Movingboxes (talk) 13:42, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fails WP:RS and WP:V by having no sources.  Fails WP:WEB on all counts. --  JediLofty Talk to meFollow me 13:48, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete Totally non-notable show. De728631 (talk) 13:54, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete, no showing of importance, borderline speedy candidate: seems like vanity. Possible redirect candidate: but do you really want the Three Wise Monkeys giving you investment advice?  I'd prefer to get financial advice from people who do see and hear evil, myself. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 13:55, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete as original speedytagger. Fails WP:WEB.  gnfnrf (talk) 13:55, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete – Sorry to say. I did inline source the article.  However, just not enough 3rd party coverage for inclusion in Wikipedia at this time.  Good Luck to the originators.  Hopefully we will see an article about the company here in the future. ShoesssS Talk 14:04, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete NN. Perfect  Proposal  14:17, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - I note that a speedy tag was removed without a or even any reason why the page shouldn't be speedied.
 * Delete - Per reasons stated above. Xeron220 (talk) 17:09, 27 August 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.