Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Four Years at Wake Forest


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the nomination was Speedy delete per creator.-- Kungfu Adam ( talk ) 15:13, 15 July 2006 (UTC)

Four Years at Wake Forest
unencyclopediac WP:OR and possibly copyvio from student handbook. Prodded and removed by anon without comment. Wikipedia is not a student guidbook. The university already as a perfectly good website for this Peripitus (Talk) 07:36, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Postdlf 07:46, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong delete fails WP:NOR, WP:NPOV, is more of an essay than an article, is a possibly copywright violation as the nominator suggests, and the blanking of this nomination by the creator of the article was a bit odd  hoopydink  Conas tá tú? 07:46, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Please note that the author added a "reference" to the article described as "anonymous Wake Forest student," and has been recently blocked from Wikimedia Commons for repeatedly uploading unsourced images; after the block expired, he merely retagged them GPL (?!) and still failed to provide source info. In light of that, I wouldn't consider blanking odd at all.  Postdlf 07:56, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. - Baseball,Baby!   balls  •  strikes  07:51, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not an encyclopedia article. Herostratus 07:58, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete This does 'not' resemble an encylopedia article in anyway whatsoever. Knowing Is Half The Battle 08:02, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment Original author has blanked the article. --ColourBurst 08:14, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
 * I restored the blanking. Given the comments about learning the loops at User talk:Charhally, I think it'd be useful to go through the process and learn the loops. But if Charhally still wants it deleted, db-author would do the trick.--Chaser T 08:18, 15 July 2006 (UTC)


 * Speedy Deletearticle is no longer relevant --Charhally 08:15, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment - authors explanation of the article on my Talk page Four Years at Wake Forest is my own description of Wake Forest based on my experience there. - Peripitus (Talk) 09:04, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - per nom. -- Kungfu Adam ( talk ) 15:00, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.