Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Four square regional


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Although this fails a headcount, "Four square regional is mostly schoolyard rituals and chants, which will never have citations" is grounds for deletion; Wikipedia is not a "holding tank." King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 00:18, 24 April 2009 (UTC)

Four square regional

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

The article is a mere list of unsourced rules. It is a bit of a content fork, as it could easily be merged to the main four square article. The article's material is not backed up by reliable sources and it unverifiable, as of August 2007. Simply put, if there was no article already, it would not pass the articles for creation process. Alex Douglas (talk) 11:59, 10 April 2009 (UTC) 
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions.  --  I 'mperator 12:18, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:02, 17 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete as unverifiable. This seems to be usage of Wikipedia as a web host. MuZemike 01:27, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Retain. Alex Douglas and I recently salvaged onto the main Four square article the material that was of general interest or well-documented.  What remains in Four square regional is mostly schoolyard rituals and chants, which will never have citations.  But such material continues to be contributed, and I have no problem with using this page as a holding tank in case future editors can make some of it rigorous enough for inclusion on the Four square page.  --Spike-from-NH (talk) 23:34, 18 April 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.