Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fourth Party


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Nomination withdrawn with no opinions to delete. Non-admin closure. Hers fold  (t/a/c) 22:51, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

Fourth Party

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Article does not cite any sources, and hasn't been touched since its creation more than 15 months ago. Fails WP:RS and WP:V. &mdash;  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 06:04, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep -- important historical cadre; subject of an entire book. Needs expansion, not deletion. Jfire (talk) 06:14, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment FYI, that's a memoir. --Dhartung | Talk 09:34, 3 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep and expand per above. This is an important part of British Parliamentary history and has been the subject of political science reviews.  Ðysepsion † Speak your mind 06:46, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep per above discussion and sources. matt91486 (talk) 06:54, 3 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep. I've added a couple more sources to give it context. There's obviously a whole series of events where they played a role. --Dhartung | Talk 09:34, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Withdraw nomination: I'll withdraw my nomination. Thanks to Jfire and Dhartung for adding to the page. &mdash;  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 13:54, 3 March 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.