Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fowler Middle School


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was no consensus, please defer merge discussion to article talk. Can&#39;t sleep, clown will eat me 08:34, 13 October 2006 (UTC)

Fowler Middle School
Non-notable Kat, Queen of Typos 21:10, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete and redirect to Tigard-Tualatin School District. TJ Spyke 23:18, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep - Bakaman Bakatalk 00:05, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
 * What is your reason for voting "keep"? TJ Spyke 01:10, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Its the oldest middle school in Tigard district and theres a whole lot of other middle schools that are on wiki that are less notable.Bakaman Bakatalk 20:00, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
 * If there are other less notable schools on the Wikipedia project, the appropriate action would be to nominate them for AFD. "Because there are worse examples" is not a reason to keep. --Kuzaar-T-C- 14:26, 11 October 2006 (UTC)


 * Redirect per TJ Spyke. Dekimasu 09:37, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as a middle school with not even any sort attempted claim to notability. wikipedia is not a directory. JoshuaZ 23:49, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep or no middle school article will be safe. High schools will be next. Then neighborhoods, technical schools, community colleges ... every middle school deserves an article. Do it for the children.Noroton 04:01, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment Are we supposed to take the above seriuosly? "Do it for the children" along with a nice little slipperly slope too? (and no, no article should be intrisically "safe" anyways. Sorry). JoshuaZ 04:16, 9 October 2006 (UTC) Note also the article is completely unsourced aside from the schools only website and a link to google maps. This wouldn't even meet WP:SCHOOLS. JoshuaZ 15:37, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment then each of the kids should have an article "for the children". LOL Carlossuarez46 16:41, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
 * CommentI agree with Carlossuarez46. As for JoshuaZ's comment: I've heard Fowler Middle School does a good job teaching its students how to spell "anyway" and "seriously", which is another reason to keep it. And yes, you should take every single thing I say absolutely seriously, even gravely.Noroton 23:57, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment And the best argument you have is mocking typos? Charming. Are you going to attempt to back up the argument in any susbstantial fashion or not? JoshuaZ 15:35, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete nn school. Carlossuarez46 16:41, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge a summary on Tigard-Tualatin School District. &mdash; RJH (talk) 18:23, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep or merge summary into Tigard-Tualatin School District article; no reason to actually delete this content. Yamaguchi先生 23:34, 9 October 2006
 * Keep or Merge per Yamaguchi and others. --Myles Long 14:17, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep, meets all applicable content policies. A merge would be perfectly reasonable. Christopher Parham (talk) 16:04, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment It wouldn't even meet the highly inclusive WP:SCHOOLS. The only source for this school is the schools own website. JoshuaZ 15:38, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
 * WP:SCHOOLS is intended to provide guidelines for organizing content, not for determining what sort of content is acceptable for inclusion. So it's not relevant to the issue of whether to delete this content. I'd be happy to see WP:SCHOOLS be applied and this article merged; this is incompatible with a recommendation to delete, however. Christopher Parham (talk) 17:08, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete or Merge into Tigard-Tualatin School District per WP:LOCAL do not keep. Vegaswikian 22:34, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge into the Tigard-Tualatin School District per WP:SCHOOLS, do not delete. RFerreira 00:42, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep, educational institution. --Vsion 02:39, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
 * keep please this is notable a merge is reasonable too Yuckfoo 07:40, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete or merge, not notable in any sense of the word, does not meet any relevent policies. --Kuzaar-T-C- 14:26, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete absolutely non-notable school. I don't see anything to merge.  Eluchil404 05:47, 12 October 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.