Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fownes Hotel


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Rather than asserting a position regarding notability or lack thereof, the nomination is posited as a question. This is not a valid rationale for deletion, as deletion nominations require a guideline- or policy-based rationale, rather than an open-ended question. North America1000 01:23, 10 October 2018 (UTC)

Fownes Hotel

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Again, a hotel. Is this notable? Am I missing something? Uhooep (talk) 00:53, 10 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep unless an actual policy-based argument is made to justify deletion. In general, being listed in Pevsner is prima facie evidence that a building is inherently notable since old Nick was fussy about what he deemed worthy of mention, so the onus is on whoever wants it deleted to provide a considerably better deletion rationale than "a hotel". &#8209; Iridescent 01:14, 10 October 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.