Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Frédéric Dalsace


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. \ Backslash Forwardslash / (talk) 21:53, 27 August 2009 (UTC)

Frédéric Dalsace

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Assistant professor, with only one publication with a lot of citations. However, not the first author on that publication. Received some minor in-house awards. Prodded earlier and deprodded, then prodded and deprodded by me. Abductive (reasoning) 22:41, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Insufficient notability to meet guidelines. ChildofMidnight (talk) 19:23, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  —David Eppstein (talk) 22:44, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Confirm findings by Abductive  : 1 journal article having 43 citations and 1 other having zero – h-index of 1. Many of his "publications" seem to actually be working papers or conference presentations. There is one from the Harvard Business Review, which could be counted, but this would only bring him to 3 pubs – still a country-mile from a pass on WP:PROF #1. Respectfully, Agricola44 (talk) 19:56, 24 August 2009 (UTC).
 * Delete in agreement with above. No sign he meets WP:PROF or WP:BIO at present. Also note that article created by, who seems to work only on articles associated with TRIUM EMBA, so suspect WP:Conflict of interest. Qwfp (talk) 14:29, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.