Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Francesca Fiorentini


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. As has been pointed out, having written a lot of things is not a notability criterium. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 09:04, 5 October 2019 (UTC)

Francesca Fiorentini

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

After checking the sources used in this article and available sources elsewhere, I don't see anything to indicate that she meets WP:GNG. A google search brings up little more than resumes, social media, and pages listing articles she's written. Not a single source used in the article is secondary. Vermont (talk) 00:22, 28 September 2019 (UTC)
 * KEEP - I'd expect Google to bring up articles she's written because her career began as a journalist before moving towards presenter work. Also, there are secondary sources on this article, yes the own website ones aren't ideal, but this can be improved upon rather than the whole article being deleted. Wikipedia has all sorts of articles for many Al Jazeera and other presenters that are arguable far less notable than this subject. Finally, we have to take into account the methods in which people consume media nowadays. Some of her current works are an online weekly news show and a podcast. This is why some of the sources aren't those that you'd associate with "traditional" e.g. New York Times or Chicago Tribune, but more online "trendy" sources for the youngsters. I don't know podcasts or video articles are really the WSJ's "thing" Apeholder (talk) 02:49, 28 September 2019 (UTC)
 * There's many articles she's written, but there's none written about her. Authors and journalists are not notable just because they've written articles. Vermont (talk) 03:27, 28 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  CASSIOPEIA(talk) 02:37, 28 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions.  CASSIOPEIA(talk) 02:37, 28 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions.  CASSIOPEIA(talk) 02:37, 28 September 2019 (UTC)
 * <small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. <b style="font-family:Georgia;font-size:80%;color:#FA0"> CASSIOPEIA</b>(<b style="#0000FF">talk</b>) 02:37, 28 September 2019 (UTC)
 * <small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Argentina-related deletion discussions. <b style="font-family:Georgia;font-size:80%;color:#FA0"> CASSIOPEIA</b>(<b style="#0000FF">talk</b>) 02:37, 28 September 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete this resume. Trillfendi (talk) 18:37, 28 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete writing lots of articles does not make someone notable. We need sources about them.John Pack Lambert (talk) 22:01, 29 September 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.