Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Francesca Genna


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure)  J 947  00:26, 16 March 2017 (UTC)

Francesca Genna

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Current referencing does not meet WP:GNG, and searches did not turn up anything not already used in the article, except for a single press release. Does not appear to meet either WP:NARTIST or WP:NACADEMIC either.  Onel 5969  TT me 20:11, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 00:29, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 00:29, 2 March 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Neutral Someone added several references since the nomination. There do seem to be some book publicaitons and article, but they are all in Italian, so I cannnot assess them. Notability seems borderline if it exists.104.163.140.193 (talk) 01:49, 2 March 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 07:17, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Comment I think there is a possible claim to notability for her work in sustainable printing techniques. She might satisfy WP:ARTIST 2: The person is known for originating a significant new concept, theory, or technique. I don't read Italian well enough to find out more about her publications, unfortunately. Mduvekot (talk) 22:23, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep. After looking into this more carefully, I realize Genna is one of Italy's most notable etchers. The sources now listed testify to her status but no doubt much more could be found.--Ipigott (talk) 16:04, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep Per . Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:28, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep per 's research and argument.--Theredproject (talk) 03:01, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep - Passes WP:GNG. CAPTAIN RAJU  (✉)   20:16, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep - Passes WP:GNG — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vinayaksingh101 (talk • contribs) 20:38, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
 * This is Vinayaksingh101 2nd edit ever, and he is suspected of socking.L3X1 (distant write)  23:44, 15 March 2017 (UTC)


 * Keep per Ipigott. L3X1 (distant write)  23:45, 15 March 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.